For years non-native EFL writing instructors have turned to scholars and researchers in English-speaking countries such as the United States, British, and Australia for appropriate approaches to teaching writing. Yet from language-based, product-based, to process-based, and genre-based approaches, mainstream writing approaches appear to address only part of the issues faced by EFL writers. Operating under the three parameters of Kumaravadivelu’s macrostrategic framework of post-method pedagogy: Particularity, practicality, and possibility (Kumaravadivelu, 2006, p. 69), the author proposed a principled eclectic approach to teaching EFL writing, adapting mainstream writing pedagogies to satisfy local needs, foregrounding local pedagogies to address student difficulty, and using a critical stance to examine and evaluate extant mainstream writing practices. Evidence is provided to illustrate this principled eclectic approach.
長久以來,本地教師在英文寫作教學法上,均師法美、英、澳等英語系國家學者。但不論是「語言導向」、「成果導向」、「過程導向」或「文體導向」等英文寫作教學法,只能解決本地學生英文寫作的部分問題。筆者根據主張「後教學法」學者Kumaravadivelu「宏觀策略架構」中的三大原則:地域特殊性、教師實用性及啟發學生潛能性(Kumaravadivelu, 2006: 69),提出一兼容並蓄之英語寫作教學方式。此一教學方式,不僅批判檢視主流寫作教學法所隱含之西方文化觀點,並修正適應臺灣大學生英語寫作之需要,更強調授課教師依學生及寫作情境需求自創寫作教學法。筆者除闡述此一教學方式之理論架構外,亦以實例簡介此一教學方式。