The Design of Integrated Curriculum in High School Civics and Society Textbooks
高中公民與社會科教科書跨學門統整課程之設計
- Keyword：
- Civics and Society, textbook design, integrated curriculum / 公民與社會科、教科書設計、統整課程
Volume 68 No.4（Open Access） - 2022-12-31
Words from the EditoralWei-chih Liou
編輯的話劉蔚之
The Design of Integrated Curriculum in High School Civics and Society TextbooksYuan-Yu Su, Meihui Liu
高中公民與社會科教科書跨學門統整課程之設計蘇苑瑜、劉美慧
Listening to Students’ Voices: Curriculum Interpretations of Fifth-grade Students in an Elementary School in South ChinaYuxin Zhan, Min-Chuan Sung
傾聽學生的聲音：中國內地南方某小學五年級學生的課程詮釋詹雨欣、宋明娟
The main points of J. Bruner’s four works from the 1950s and their pedagogical implicationsWen-jing Shan, Hsiao-Feng Tsai & Po-chuan Kao
J. Bruner 1950年代四項著作述要及其教學意蘊單文經、蔡曉楓、高博銓
Book Review: Manifesto for a Post-Critical PedagogyFeng-Jihu Lee
書評：後—批判教學論宣言李奉儒
- Summary
- Chinese Summary
- Reference
- Scholarly references
This study explores how integrated curriculum in the textbooks of Civics and Society in senior high schools were designed and how textbook editors responded to integrated curriculum reforms by adopting a two-stage research design. In the first stage, the researchers analyzed learning content structure, and in the second stage, conducted semi-structured interviews with textbook editors to explore their considerations for designing an integrated curriculum and the dilemmas of textbooks’ organization and integrated design. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, integrated curriculum in the Civics and Society textbooks of senior high schools were designed from a multidisciplinary perspective, which placed two or more disciplines side-by-side and was not a sufficient condition for interdisciplinary approach. Second, the editors believed that the definition of integrated curriculum in curriculumguidelines were ambiguous. Third, editors avoided dramatic changes in the curriculum organization with concerns to textbook marketing. Fourth, there existed a vast difference between editors and the review committee in the conception of integrated curriculum. Finally, editors did not have enough time to adjust disciplinary-based to interdisciplinary design.
108課綱課程改革強調跨領域課程統整，規範高中公民與社會科應避免社會科學分論方式組織教材，為教科書編寫的一大挑戰。本研究旨在探討高中公民與社會科教科書跨學門統整課程設計之內涵，以及編者編寫教科書歷程中如何因應課程統整變革及其考量。本研究採二階段研究設計，第一階段透過教科書內容分析，瞭解教科書學習內容概念架構及跨學門統整課程設計情況；第二階段訪談教科書編者，探究教科書課程組織及統整課程設計背後的考量、影響因素及困境。本研究發現，高中公民與社會科教科書統整課程設計傾向學門界線分明的多學科模式。影響教科書統整課程設計之因素及困境，包含：編者認為課綱跨學門課程組織及統整規範不夠具體；編者顧及市場銷售，避免課程組織及統整設計大幅度變動；編審對學門統整認知不同，分論分工編寫方式不及因應跨學門融合設計。
呂秀蓮（2017）。課綱使用的理論與實例：素養為本課程設計之入門概念。大衛營文化。
[Lu, H.-L. (2017). The theory and practice of curriculum guideline: The competency-based curriculum design. Da Wei
Ying Culture.]
周淑卿、王郁雯（2019）。從課程統整到跨領域課程：臺灣二十年的論述與問題。教育學報，47（2），41-59。
[Chou, S.-C., & Wang, Y.-W. (2019). From curriculum integration to cross-disciplinary curriculum: Twenty Years of
reform discourse and problems in Taiwan. Education Journal, 47(2), 41-59.]
國家教育研究院（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程發展建議書。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/
8006/51082/5dcfe708-8956-4324-867e-564fdecbe001.pdf
[National Academic for Educational Research. (2014). Recommendations for curriculum development of 12-year basic
education. https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/ 8006/51082/5dcfe708-8956-4324-867e-564fdecbe001.pdf]
國家教育研究院（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程社會領域課綱及教科書編審三方座談會議紀錄。https://
textbooks.naer.edu.tw/MeetingOpen.aspx
[National Academic for Educational Research. (2018). Minutes of social studies curriculum guideline committee,
textbook editors and the review committee joint meeting. https:// textbooks.naer.edu.tw/MeetingOpen.aspx]
張茂桂（2009）。再探公民：反思高中《公民與社會》新課綱之訂定。公民訓育學報，20，1-31。
[Chang, M.-K. (2009). Civic education revisited: Reflecting on the making of new course outline for high school “Civics
and Society”. Bulletin of Civic and Moral Education, 20, 1-31.]
教育部（2005）。普通高級中學公民與社會課程暫行綱要。https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/ Cur/Index?
filter=693F41A9-9C10-4F04-AD6C-AF1852E681C7
[Ministry of Education. (2005). The tentative curriculum guidelines of high school Civics and Society. https://www.k12ea.
gov.tw/Tw/Cur/Index?filter=693F41A9-9C10-4F04-AD6CAF1852E681C7]
教育部（2009）。普通高級中學必修科目公民與社會課程綱要。https://reurl.cc/nZq2mX
[Ministry of Education. (2009). Curriculum guidelines of high school Civics and Society. https://reurl.cc/nZq2mX]
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113,c639-1.php?
Lang=zh-tw
[Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: General guidelines. https://www.
naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw]
教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要：社會領域。https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113, c639
-1.php?Lang=zh-tw
[Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education for elementaryschool, junior high and
general senior high schools: The domain of social studies. https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113,c639-1.php?
Lang=zh-tw]
董秀蘭（2018，10月3日）。十二年國教公民與社會課程綱要的理念與內涵[專題演講]。教育部普通高級中等學校
公民與社會學科中心北區公民與社會科教師專業成長社群研習會，臺北市。
[Doong, S.-L. (2018, October 3). The ideas and meanings of Civics and Society curriculum guidelines for 12-year basic
education [Invited talk]. Civics and Society Resource Center, Taipei, Taiwan.]
蘇苑瑜（2021）。高中公民與社會科素養導向的教科書發展與設計—教科書內容分析與編者觀點探究[未出版之
博士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
[Su, Y.-Y. (2021). The development and design of competence-oriented textbooks for Civics and Society in high schools
— Content analysis of textbooks and perspectives from textbook editors [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
National Taiwan Normal University.]
Boix Mansilla, V., & Gardner, H. (2003). Assessing interdisciplinary work at the frontier: Anempirical exploration of
“symptoms of quality.” GoodWork Project Report Series. http://www.pz.harvard.edu/ebookstore/search_results.
cfm
Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2008). Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education
collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ j.2168-9830.2008.tb00962.x
Choi, B. C., & Pak, A. W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research,
services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical Investigative
Medicine, 29(6), 351-364.
Drake, S. M. (1998). Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways to increase student learning. Corwin Press.
Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
Grady, J. B. (1994, March 19-22). Interdisciplinary curriculum development [Paperpresentation]. 49th Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development Annual Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, IL.
Haynes, C. (2002). Introduction: Laying a foundation for interdisciplinary teaching. In C. Haynes (Ed.), Innovations in
interdisciplinary teaching (pp. xi-xxii). Oryx Press.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. ASCD.
Madni, A. M. (2007). Transdisciplinarity: Reaching beyond disciplines to find connections. Journal of Integrated Design
and Process Science, 11(1), 1-11.
Martorella, P. H. (1996). Teaching social studies in middle and secondary schools. Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Moran, J. (2002). Interdisciplinarity. Routledge.
Nelson, J. L., & Michaelis, J. U. (1980). Secondary social studies: Instruction, curriculum, evaluation. Prentice-Hall.
Nikitina, S. (2005). Pathways of interdisciplinary cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 23(3), 389-425. https://doi.org/10.
1207/s1532690xci2303_3
Repko, A. F. (2007). Interdisciplinary curriculum design. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 11(1), 130-137.
Ross, W. E., Mathison, S., & Vinson, K. D. (2014). Social studies curriculum teaching in the era of standardization. In W.
Ross (Ed.), The social studies curriculum: Purposes, problems, and possibilities (4th ed., pp. 25-50). SUNY Press.
.png)
