Exploring Confucius’ Teaching Philosophy through Questions and Answers with Zigong
以「子貢問答」重探孔子的教學理念
- Keyword：
- Zigong、Confucius、question-answer format、teaching philosophy、Analects / 子貢、孔子、問答形式、教學理念、論語
Volume 68 No.3（Open Access） - 2022-09-30
Words from the EditoralYi-Lin Chen
陳伊琳
Presentism in History Teaching: Clarification of Historiographical and Instructional ApproachesPei-Fen Sung
宋佩芬
A local perspective of school system reform: The development of primary and secondary education in Fukien since the enactment of Kuei-Mao school system in late Ch’ing ChinaYu-Wen Chou
學制改革的地方視角：晚清癸卯學制實施後福建中小學教育的發展周愚文
Exploring Confucius’ Teaching Philosophy through Questions and Answers with ZigongSheng-Hsin Hsu
以「子貢問答」重探孔子的教學理念徐聖心
Book Review: Pop Music, Media, and Youth Cultures: From the Beat Revolution to the Bit GenerationYing-Jie Jheng
書評：「戰場」轉移-評介《流行樂、媒體與青少年文化：從「節拍革命」到「位元世代」》鄭英傑
- Summary
- Chinese Summary
- Reference
- Scholarly references
This study analyzed themes from the Analects to present the particularities of Confucius’ teaching. The main discussion is about Zigong, who appears the most frequently in the Analects. This paper contains two parts: the form and theme of the questions and answers; a glimpse of Confucius’ teaching philosophy. The question answer format in the Analects is simple. This is not only due to difficulty of recording Confucius’ words but also because Confucius’ “practice-oriented” teaching was expressed in the form of simple words, expressed as roundabout prompts and suspenseful questions. The three themes in the questions and answers of the Analects include: 1) gentlemen “putting actions first”, 2) the “holistic view of man”, and 3) suspenseful questions which lead students into their inner experience and achieve the ultimacy in man. The analysis shows that, Confucius, as a teacher, is both a forerunner, a discerner of people and characters, a waiter, a timely redirector, and a consistent “non-dualist”. These concepts and teachings are still inspiring even today.
本文從《論語》的表達形式選擇主題，並以次數最多的子貢問答為主要考察對象，呈現孔子教學的特殊性。本研究包含兩部分：一是問答的形式與主題；二是據此管窺孔子的教學理念。第一部分，問答形式的精簡，除了是記載的簡約要求外，乃因「實踐為主」的教學，宜以指點語的方式表出。指點語又可細分且開展為迂迴性提示和懸疑性問法。問答主題有三：君子「以行為先」的「生命一致性」、自知與成器；以「整體觀人法」為評議著眼，並包含兩個子向度，即德性的鑑真與德行的辨偽；最後則是如何以懸疑式提問引導學生進入內在體驗，而達於人的極致。第二部分，身為教師的孔子，既是先行者，又是對人與人物的精鑑察識者，也是等候者，又是適時撥轉者，更是示現為一以貫之的「不二者」。而這些現身說法的理念與教法，即使在今日，依舊有其啟示作用。
下村湖人（1978）。論語故事（林耀南，譯）。協志工業叢書。（原著出版於1950）
[Shimomura, K. (1978). The story in the Analects (Y.-N. Lin, Trans.). Hsieh-Chih Industrial Library. (Original work
published 1950)]
方東美（1985）。新儒家哲學十八講。黎明文化。
[Fang, T.-H. (1985). Eighteen lectures on Neo-Confucian philosophy. Li Ming Cultural.]
朱熹（1967）。四書集注。世界書局。
[Zhu, H. (1967). Exegesis of the collections of texts from the four books. World Book.]
竹添光鴻（1999）。論語會箋（上）。廣文。（原著出版於1934）
[Takezoe, K. (1999). Collected Commentaries on the Analects. Kwangwen. (Original work published 1934)]
李奉儒（2003）。P. Freire的批判教學論對於教師實踐教育改革的啟示。教育研究集刊，49（3），1-30。
[Lee, F.-J. (2003). P. Freire’s critical pedagogy and its implications for teachers implementing educational reforms in
Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Research, 49(3), 1-30.]
林啟屏（2005）。古代儒學史中的子貢。文與哲，7，97-124。
[Lin, C.-P. (2005). On Zigong in ancient Confucian history. Literature & Philosophy, 7, 97-124.]
河北省文物研究所（1997）。定州漢墓竹簡論語。文物。
[Hebei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics. (1997). The handwritten copy of bamboo-slip Analects discovered in a Han
dynasty tomb in Dingzhou City. Wenwu.]
徐聖心（2021）。心之無對性—先秦儒學體現的文化性格。臺大出版中心。
[Hsu, S.-H. (2001). Non-oppositeness of hsin: The character of culture that Confucian performs in pre-Chin. National
Taiwan University Press.]
祝平次（2008）。權威、言行關係與仁：論《論語》中的問答形式。東吳哲學學報，18，23-56。
[Chu, P.-T. (2008). Authority, the relationship between words and deeds, and humanity: Question-answer Format in the
Analects. Soochow Journal of Philosophical Studies, 18, 23-56.]
張東蓀（1974）。理性與民主。廬山。
[Chang, T.-S. (1974). Rationality and democracy. Lushan.]
許從聖（2017）。孔子教學觀的一個側面—以《論語．公冶長》「聞一知十」章為探討基點。鵝湖月刊，43
（4），36-50。
[Hsu, T.-S. (2017). An examination of the educational philosophy of Confucius, with a focus on the viewpoint of
“Knowing everything from learning and understanding one thing.” Legein Monthly, 43(4), 36-50.]
陳閔翔、洪仁進（2007）。追尋教學的藝術—從J. Dewey思想衍繹教師角色與教學的美感特質。教育研究集刊，
53（1），87-118。
[Chen, M.-S., & Horng, R.-J. (2007). In search of the art of teaching: The implications of J. Dewey’s thought for aesthetic
qualities of the practice of teaching. Bulletin of Educational Research, 53(1), 87-118.]
陶潛（著），楊勇（校箋）（1987）。陶淵明集校箋。正文書局。
[Tao, Q., Young, Y. (Remarks). (1987). Emendation and annotation of Tao Yuan Ming’s Anthology. Cheng Wen Book.]
陸九淵（1979）。象山全集（四部備要）。中華書局。
[Lu, X.-S. (1979). The Complete Works of Xiang-shan [Ssu Pu Pei Yao]. Chung Hwa Book.]
程樹德（撰），程俊英、蔣見元（點校）（1990）。論語集釋（四部備要）。中華書局。
[Cheng, S.-D., Cheng, J.-Y., & Jiang, J.-Y. (Remarks). (1990). The complete works of Xiangshan [Ssu Pu Pei Yao]. Chung
Hwa Book.]
楊伯峻（1982）。春秋左傳注。源流。
[Yang, B.-J. (1979). Commentary on the annals of the Spring and Autumn Periods with Zuoqiu Ming’s Exegesis. Yuanliu.]
劉錦賢（2011）。子貢之學行述論。興大中文學報，29，41-75。
[Liu, C.-H. (2011). Exposition of Zi-gong’s scholastic and moral performance. Jornal of the Chinese Department, National
Chung Hsing University, 29, 41-75.]
錢穆（1988）。論語新解。東大圖書。
[Chien, M. (1988). The new interpretation of Analects of Confucius. The Great East Book.]
錢穆（1993）。莊子纂箋。東大圖書。
[Chien, M. (1993). Collected commentaries on the Zhuangzi. The Great East Book.]
簡成熙、洪如玉、何佳瑞、李彥儀（2021）。東西方教育理論與實務之對話。教育研究集刊，67（2），115-
137。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082021066702004
[Chien, C.-H., Hung, R.-Y., Katia Lenehan, & Lee, Y.-Y. (2021). A dialogue between EastWest educational theories and
practices. Bulletin of Educational Research, 67(2), 115-137. https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082021066702004]
簡良如（2017）。文本閱讀之客觀性—再探譚家哲經典釋義方法。文與哲，31，417-468。
[Chien, L.-J. (2017). On the objectivity of the reading of text: A further examination of the method of interpretation of the
classics of Tan Jia-zhe. Literature & Philosophy, 31, 417-468.]
譚家哲（2010）。孟子平解。唐山書店。
[Tang, J.-Z. (2010). Interpretation of the Mencius. Tonsan Books.]
譚家哲（2012）。論語平解。漫遊者文化。
[Tang, J.-Z. (2012). Interpretation of the Analects of Confucius. Azoth Books.]
Freire, P. (2020). 受壓迫者的教育學（方永泉、張珍瑋，譯）。巨流。（原著出版於2000）
[Freire, P. (2020). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Y.-C. Fang & C.-W. Chang, Trans.). Chuliu Book. (Original work published
2000)]
Hegel, G. W. F. (1997). 哲學史講演錄（賀麟、王太慶，譯）。商務印書館。（原著出版於1928）
[Hegel, G. W. F. (1997). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie (L. He & T. Wang, Trans.). The Commercial
Press. (Original work published 1928)]
Jaspers, K. (1983). 雅斯培論教育（杜意風，譯）。聯經。（原著出版於1977）
[Jaspers, K. (1983). Was ist Erziehung? (Y.-F. Du, Trans.). Linking Book. (Original work published 1977)]
Morgan, G. C. (1996). 摩根解經叢卷．馬太福音（張竹君，譯）。美國活泉。（原著出版於1984）
[Morgan, G. C. (1996). Morgam’s Expository Series– The Gospel According to Matthew (C.-C. Chang, Trans.). Living
Spring. (Original work published 1984)]
.png)
