Learning from Rugg’s and Bruner’s Curriculum Reforms in Social Studies
Rugg 及 Bruner 社會領域課程 改革經驗的啟示
- Keyword：
- Rugg、Bruner / Harold Rugg, Jerome Bruner, social studies, curriculum reform / 社會領域、課程改革、革新論者
Volume 51 No.1 - 2005-03-31
Learning from Rugg’s and Bruner’s Curriculum Reforms in Social StudiesWen-Jing Shan
Rugg 及 Bruner 社會領域課程 改革經驗的啟示單文經
Technology-Instruction Integration: Learning from America’s Experience and Reflecting on Taiwan’s DevelopmentYao-Ting Sung Kuo-En Chang Huei-Tze Hou
資訊科技融入教學： 借鏡美國經驗，反思臺灣發展宋曜廷 張國恩 侯惠澤
Teachers’ Creative Learning Process in a Problem-based Learning Action Research Project Chin-Hsieh Lu Ching-Ling Wu Yen-Wei Chen Tsui-Ling Yang Yun-Chi Tsou
「問題本位學習」協同行動中 教師課程與教學的創新歷程呂金燮、吳青陵、陳彥瑋、楊翠凌、鄒韻淇
Using Poker Games in Math as a Creative Means of Teaching Factors: An Action Research ApproachKuo-Hsun Huang Shiang-Tung Liu
撲克牌融入因數教學之 創意教學行動研究黃國勳 劉祥通
On Passing the University’s Tasks into the Hands of “Administrative Legal Persons”: A Critique from the Perspective of Governmental ReengineeringChien-Yuan Tseng Hsi-Fong Chen
從政府改造論大學行政法人化之問題曾建元 陳錫鋒
- Summary
- Chinese Summary
- Reference
- Scholarly references
This paper presents the lessons we can learn from the curriculum reform in social studies initiated by two progressive scholars, Harold Rugg and Jerome S. Bruner. In the 1930s, Rugg and his colleagues developed a set of social studies textbooks focusing on the fundamental problems faced by Americans. In the1960s, Bruner led a research team in the construction of a multi-media based curriculum, “Man: A Course of Study.” These two programs of social studies curriculum reform, although both widely acclaimed by the American educational community at the time, did not last long because they provoked controversy among politicians and in the American public. Several implications of this for Taiwan’s recent curriculum reform in social studies are suggested
1916 年，美國的中小學才開始設有以社會為名的學習領域或學科。過去，與 社會領域課程相關的學科主要為歷史，一般中小學社會領域課程也以開設歷史科 者為最普遍，間或有開設地理或是公民政府者。然而，社會領域的課程究應以增 進學生的社會科學知能為目的，抑或以提昇其社會探究能力為目的，始終未有定 論；又，該一領域的課程究應以學科知識為其組織的核心，抑或以議題中心為其 組織的重點，變異亦時有所聞。若將持前一觀點者稱為傳統論者，則持後一觀點 者或可稱為革新論者。本文的主旨即在以美國二位革新論者H. Rugg及J. S. Bruner 分別在 1930 年代和 1960 年代，所領導的社會領域課程改革運動為對象，梳理其 來龍去脈，評估其改革成效，期能歸納其啟示。
