Volume 67 No.1 - 2021-03-31

Using Reality Games in Off-Campus Teaching to Deepen Students’ Engaged Learning and Understanding: The Case of “Inquiring After Mackay’s Footprints”

以實境體驗遊戲融入校外教學深化學生多面向的參與式學習與理解:以〈尋訪馬偕足跡〉為例

Author：
Li-Hua Chen, Wei-Ling Yeh, Yueh-Mei Lin, Chao-Yueh Cheng, Hui-Mei Fan / 陳麗華、葉韋伶、林月梅、鄭詔月、范惠美
Keyword：
off-campus teaching, competence-based curriculum and teaching design, engaged learning, reality game, understandings / 校外教學、素養導向課程與教學設計、參與式學習、實境體驗遊戲、學習理解
  • Summary
  • Chinese Summary
  • Reference
  • Scholarly references
Integrating three elements of reality games into the development of a project named “Exploring Mackay’s Footprints,” this research investigates how reality games can be used in off-campus teaching to deepen students’ engaged learning and understanding. After the implementation the three elements of reality games, namely, puzzle solving, embodied experience and group performance into designing the off- campus teaching project, the students’ learning performances were examined. The opinions and feedbacks of students, teachers, and volunteer parents were collected through observations, interviews and document analysis. Qualitative research approach was adopted into data collection, analysis and interpretation. The research results include, firstly, three elements of reality games and one digital puzzle-solving technique comprised in the project, secondly, multi-faceted engagements shown during students’ learning targets, learning processes, themes, relationships, and the human environment, and thirdly, multi-faceted understandings of explanation, interpretation, application, perspective, and empathy achieved from students’ inquiry. Finally, the article ends with six practical wisdoms for competence-based curriculum and proposal of teaching design.
目前學校辦理的校外教學，普遍欠缺十二年國教倡議的素養導向教學精神。 而風靡於青少年世代的實境解謎遊戲，具有謎題破解、身體經驗、群體表演等 設計要素，與素養導向設計若合符節，展現新世代的學習樣態。為此，本計畫透 過與新北市淡水區國小之教師社群協作，將實境體驗遊戲的設計元素融入〈尋訪 馬偕足跡〉校外探究學習方案的設計中，並在實施後檢視學生的學習表現。本計 畫採用質性研究取徑，過程中兼採觀察、訪談、文件分析等資料蒐集與分析技 術，彙集學生、教師及家長的意見和相關文件，加以分析、歸納和詮釋。研究結果顯示:一、在方案設計方面，能涵蓋實境體驗遊戲的三大要素及融入數位解題 技術;二、在學習過程中，學生能展現學習事物、學習歷程、題材脈絡、人脈關 係、人類環境等多面向的參與和探究學習樣態;三、在學習結果方面，學生對主 題的探究學習達到說明、詮釋、應用、觀點、同理心等多面向的理解，惟自我認 識面向的理解較不明顯。研究最後提出六項落實素養導向課程與教學的實踐智 慧。

卯靜儒、黃政傑、陳麗華、藍偉瑩(2019)。課程與教學改革經驗之辨證與反思。教育研究集刊，65(4)，117-138。

[Mao, C.-J., Hwang, J.-J., Chen, L.-H., & Lan, W.-Y. (2019). Dialectic and reflection on reform experiences of curriculum and instruction. Bulletin of Educational Research, 65(4), 117-138.] 

林夙瑩(2018)。博物館真人實境遊戲活動規劃之前置性評量:國立臺灣史前文化博物館南科館個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南藝術大學，臺南市。

[Lin, S.-Y. (2018). The front-end evaluation on reality games in museums: A case study of the National Museum of Prehistory, Southern Taiwan Science Park Branch (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tainan National University of the Arts, Tainan, Taiwan.] 

林原君(2015)。實境遊戲之設計流程與製作之研究— 以真人實境密室逃脫設計為例  (未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。

[Lin, Y.-C. (2015). A research design of reality game on model and production: A real escape game (Unpublished master’s thesis). Taipei University of Education, Taipei City, Taiwan.]

孟晉塘(2015)。台灣實境遊戲業商業模式初探(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大 學，臺南市。

[Meng, C.-T. (2015). An exploratory research on business models of Taiwan reality games (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.]

范信賢(2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:導讀《國民核心素養: 十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。教育脈動，5。https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/ img/67/379316110.pdf

秋田喜代美(2017，4月29日)。日本教師如何支援學生主體的、深度的學習?素養導向 教材設計研討會:國外教科書案例分析，臺北市。

[Akita, K. (2017, April, 29). How do Japanese teachers support student-based and deep learning? Paper present at “Competence-based Textbook Design Seminar: Case Analysis of Foreign Textbooks, Tamkang University, Taipei City, Taiwan.]

教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市:作者。
[Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education general guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.] 

教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校—社會領域。臺北市:作者。

[Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: Social studies. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.]

陳麗華(2013)。服務學習的真諦。臺灣教育評論月刊，2(2)，1-4。

[Chen, L.-H. (2013). The true meaning of service learning. Taiwan Educational Review, 2(2),1-4.] 

陳麗華(2018)。從中小學的教材教法談課綱的未來想像。教科書研究，11(2)，111-119。 陳麗華(2020)。社會領域參與式學習策略。載於陳麗華、詹寶菁(主編)，國小社會領域教材教法(頁97-110)。臺北市:教育部。

[Chen, L.-H. (2020). The strategies of engaged learning in social studies. In L.-H. Chen & B.-J.Chan (Eds.), Teaching materials and methods of social studies in elementary school (pp.97-110). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.] 

陳麗華、葉韋伶(2019)。以教習劇場深化學生全球議題之探究與理解— 以快時尚議題為焦點。教育研究與發展期刊，15(2)，27-56。

[Chen, L.-H., & Yeh, W.-L. (2019). Using TIE to deepen students’ inquiry and understanding of global issues: Focus on fast fashion issues. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 15(2), 27-56.]

游旻寧(2018)。「故宮不思議事件簿」— 以博物館為場域的實境解謎遊戲。故宮文物，424，122-127。

[Yu, M.-N. (2018). National Palace Museum–A reality game based on the museum. National Palace Museum, 424, 122-127.]

黃薇仰(2016)。逃出牢籠— 實境密室遊戲中的經驗與療癒(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學，新竹市。

[HuangW.-Y. (2016). Escape from the cage: A Study of the experience of Healing Effect in Reality Escape Games (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.]

鄧育仁、趙綺芳、余舜德(2011)。書評:《The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding》。臺灣人類學刊，9(1)，195-208。

[Teng, Y.-J., Choo, C.-F., & Yu, S.-T. (2011). Book review: The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Taiwan Journal of Anthropology, 9(1), 195-208.]

盧玫如(2017)。同質/異質分組在博物館導覽實境遊戲學習中之學習成效探討(未出 版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

[Lu, M.-R. (2017). Exploring the effects of heterogeneous and homogenous groupings on game- based museum guidance (Unpublished master’s thesis). Taiwan Normal University, Taipei,Taiwan.]

Anderson, W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s educational objectives. New York, NY: Longamn.

Bloom, B. S., Engelahar, M. D., Frust, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D.R.(1956). Taxonomy of educational objective, handbook 1: Cognitive fomain. New York, NY: David McKay. Borrego, C., Fernández, C., Blanes, I., & Robles, S. (2017). Room escape at class: Escape games activities to facilitate the motivation and learning in computer science. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(2), 162-171. 

Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making feterminations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186-213.

Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Merleau Ponty, M. (2007). 眼與心:身體現象學大師梅洛龐蒂的最後書寫(龔卓君，譯)。臺北市:典藏。

[Merleau Ponty, M. (2007). Eyes and hearts: The final writing of Merleau Ponty, master of physical phenomenology (C.-C. Kung, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Artouch.]

Pellegrino, J. W. (2017). Teaching, learning and assessing 21st century skills. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession (pp. 223- 252). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

Shapiro, S. B. (2002). The commonality of the body: Pedagogy and peace culture. In G. Salomon & B. Nevo (Eds.), Peace education: The concept, principles, and practices around the world (pp. 143-154). London, UK: Psychology Press.

Weber, N. (2014). Didactic or dialogical? The shifting nature of INGO development education programme in England and Canada. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 6(1), 39.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

 

 


EndNote
下載可匯入格式