Volume 68 No.2（Open Access） - 2022-06-30

Crossing-boundary Approaches and Collaborative Strategies in Education Governance

教育治理之跨域途徑與協力策略

Author：
Chuo-Chun Hsieh / 謝卓君
Keyword：
collaborative governance, higher education-job mismatch, education governance, new public governance, crossing-boundary governance / 協力治理、高等教育學用落差、教育治理、新公共治理、跨域治理
  • Summary
  • Chinese Summary
  • Reference
  • Scholarly references
　　In the face of the complexity and uncertainty brought about by rapid social changes, governments not only need to demonstrate efficiency but also require capabilities to respond and deal with emergencies when governing education issues. For promoting the understanding of education governance, this study examines crossingboundary approaches and collaborative strategies from the theoretical perspective of public administration, and further develops an analytical framework for analyzing crossing-boundary and collaborative governance of educational issues. To that end, this study is identified as theory-building research by adopting an analytical conceptual approach. This paper firstly defines prominent concepts of crossing-boundary and collaborative governance based on the literature on public administration, and then illustrates the relationships between and diversity of the various concepts. Secondly, the study explores the features of crossing-boundary approaches and collaborative strategies based on the research results yielded from the content analysis of media news and governmental documents regarding a case study on the policy issue of bridging the gap between higher education and the job market in Taiwan. Finally, the paper provides a two-dimensional framework for analyzing various types of crossing boundaries and collaboration in education governance by synthesizing the theories derived from the literature on public administration and the practical evidence offered by the empirical case.
　　面對社會快速變遷帶來的複雜性與不確定性，政府治理教育不僅需展現效率，更應具備面對危機事件的應變與協調能力。為增進對教育治理的理解，本研究透過公共行政的理論視角，探究教育治理可能之跨域途徑與協力策略，並進一步建構有助於理解教育跨域與協力治理的分析架構。為達上述目的，本研究採分析式理論建構之研究取向，首先爬梳公共行政理論，以界定跨域與協力治理的重要概念，並說明不同概念之間的關係。其次，以臺灣高等教育學用落差議題為例，透過新聞內容分析以及政策文本分析結果，檢視個案教育議題反映之治理途徑與策略特性。最後，本研究綜合公共行政文獻與教育治理實務經驗，提出可用以探究與理解教育跨域與協力治理特性之二維向度分析架構。

王建軍、黃顯華（2003）。協作式的課程發展與教師專業發展。載於黃顯華、孔繁盛（編），課程發展與教師專

　　業發展的夥伴協作（頁1-18）。香港：香港中文大學。

[Wang, J.-J., & Huang, X.-H. (2003). Collaborative curriculum development and teacher professional development. In X.-

　　H. Huang & F.-S. Kong (Eds.), Partnerships for curriculum and teacher professional development (pp. 1-18). Hong

　　Kong, China: The Education University of Hong Kong.]

行政院（2012）。縮短學訓考用落差方案。取自https://www.ndc.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?

　　n=9CB39E0F5292E9C1&sms=DB5CA7E8ABA7E5DC&s=313ADD1572778FB9

[Executive Yuan. (2012). Shortening the gap between school training and examination scheme. Retrieved from https://

　　www.ndc.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9CB39E0F5292E9C1&sms=DB5CA7E8ABA7E5DC&s=313ADD1572778

　　FB9]

行政院經濟建設委員會（2005）。新世紀第二期人力發展計畫。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?

　　u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvNjM4NS8yMzEyOS8wMDAwNDU0XzcucGRm

　　&n=bWFucG93ZXIgcmVwb3J0IDk0Xzk3LnBkZg%3D%3D&icon=..pdf

[Economic Development Committee of the Executive Yuan. (2005). The second phase of the new century human

　　development plan. Retrieved from https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?

　　u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvNjM4NS8yMzEyOS8wMDAwNDU0XzcucGRm

　　&n=bWFucG93ZXIgcmVwb3J0IDk0Xzk3LnBkZg%3D%3D&icon=..pdf]

朱鎮明（2010）。競爭型計畫與臺灣府際夥伴關係的實踐。公共行政學報，37，71-110。

[Chu, C.-M. (2010). Competitive grant program and the practice of intergovernmental partnership in Taiwan. Journal of

　　Public Administration, 37, 71-110.]

朱鎮明、朱景鵬（2016）。跨部會協調的績效管理新思維。國土及公共治理，4（3）， 26-41

[Chu, C.-M., & Chu, C.-P. (2010). New thinking of performance management of inter-ministerial coordination. Public

　　Governance Quarterly, 4(3), 26-41.]

吳瓊恩（2002）。公共行政學發展趨勢的探究：三種治理模式的互補關係及其政治理論 基礎。公共行政學報，

　　7，173-220

[Wu, C.-E. (2002). A study for the future development of public administration: The reciprocal relationship of the three

　　governance models and its basis of political theory. Journal of Public Administration, 7, 173-220.]

李武育、陳薇如（2008）。以跨域治理概念論計畫型補助政策執行力管理。研考雙月 刊，32（2），41-49。

[Lee, W.-Y., & Chen, W.-R. (2008). Execution management practices of program grant policies: A governance across

　　boundaries idea. Bimonthly for Research, Development and Evaluation, 32(2), 41-49.]

李長晏、林煥笙（2009）。中央與地方協力夥伴關係之分析—以台中縣潭子段旱溪整 治工程為例。公共行政學

　　報，31，49-100。

[Lee, C.-Y., & Lin, H.-S. (2009). Analyzing on collaborative partnership in Taiwan’s central and local governments－ The

　　case of a flood control construction project on Han River in Tanzih township in Taichung county. Journal of Public

　　Administration, 31, 49-100.]

林淑馨（2016）。臺灣非營利組織與地方政府協力的實證分析：以六縣市為例。政治科 學論叢，69，103-148。

　　https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.69(103-148)

[Lin, S.-H. (2016). Empirical analysis of partnership between non-profit organizations and local governments: Evidence

　　from six cities and counties in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Political Science, 69, 103-148. https://doi.org/10.6166/

　　TJPS.69(103-148)]

教育部（2013）。人才培育白皮書。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-4176, c249-1.php

[Minstry of Education. (2013). White paper on talent cultivation. Retrieved from https://www. naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-

　　4176,c249-1.php]

教育部（2016）。立法院教育及文化委員會第九屆第一會期：教育部施政理念與政策報 告。取自https://depart.

　　moe.edu.tw/ED2100/News.aspx?n=DD4EE6573B631E98&sms=C19D0356F9FDE0CC

[Minstry of Education. (2016). The first session of the Ninth Session of the Education and Culture Committee of the

　　Legislative Yuan: Ministry of Education governance philosophy and policy report. Retrieved from https://depart.moe.

　　edu.tw/ED2100/News.aspx?n=DD4E E6573B631E98&sms=C19D0356F9FDE0CC]

許秩維（2020，4月9日）。武漢肺炎／台師大第二例確診，全國首件大學停課改遠距教 學。中央通訊社。取自

　　https://www.cna.com.tw/

[Hsu, C.-W. (2020). Wuhan pneumonia / Taiwan Normal University confirmed the second case, the first university to

　　suspend classes and change to distance teaching. Central News Agency. Retrieved from https://www.cna.com.tw/]

陳海雄、戴純眉（2007）。行政院跨部會政策協調機制之建置。研考雙月刊，31（6）， 95-106。

[Chen, H.-H., & Dai, C.-M. (2007). The establishment of the inter-agency plicy cordination mchanism of the Executive

　　Yuan. Bimonthly for Research, Development and Evaluation, 32(2), 41-49.]

陳惠珍（2012，6月15日）。畢業即就業、南市工測會伴紅娘。中時新聞網。取自https:// www.chinatimes.com/?

　　chdtv

[Chen, H.-Z. (2012). Graduation as employment, the bridesmaid of the Nanshi industrial testing association. China Times

　　News. Retrieved from https://www.chinatimes.com/?chdtv]

陳榮政（2019）。教育行政與治理：新管理主義途徑。臺北市：學富。

[Chen, J.-C. (2019). Educational administration and governance: A new managerial approach. Taipei, Taiwan: Pro-ED.]

黃炳欽、張國保（2007）。教育部推動產學合作現況與發展方向。人文社會科學研究，1 （1），1-19。

[Huang, B.-Q., & Zhang, G.-B. (2007). The Ministry of Education promotes the industryuniversity cooperation: Current

　　situation and development direction. Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 1(1), 1-19.]

楊瑩（2016）。近年來我國高等教育產學合作相關政策之推動。臺灣教育，702，10- 18。

[Chan, Y. (2016). Recent promotion of policies of collaboration between industry and higher education in Taiwan. Taiwan

　　Education, 702, 10-18.]

劉盈慧（2013，2月8日）。縮短產學落差，國科會推產學合作平台。聯合報，A3版。

[Liu, Y.-H. (2013, February 8). Shorten the gap between industry and academia, National Science Council promotes an

　　industry-university cooperation platform. Lianhe Daily, A3.]

廖洲棚（2014）。論跨機關管制行政之政策協調：賽局理論的觀點。行政暨政策學報， 59，89-126。

[Liao, Z.-P. (2014). An analysis of policy coordination of cross-agency regulatory administration: A game theoretic

　　perspective. Public Administration & Policy, 59, 89-126.]

蔡允棟（2006）。民主行政與網絡治理：「新治理」的理論探討及類型分析。臺灣政治 學刊，10（1），163-

　　209。

[Tsai, Y.-T. (2006). Democratic administration and network governance: Theory and types of new governance. The

　　Taiwanese Political Science Review, 10(1), 163-209.]

戴伯芬（2015）。學用落差的論述分析與敘事—《聯合報》、《中國時報》與《蘋果日報》之比較。傳播研究與

　　實踐，5（2），53-78。https://doi.org/10.6123/JCRP. 2015.11

[Tai, P.-F. (2015). Discourse analysis and narrative of education-job mismatches: A comparative study of “United Daily

　　News,” “China Times” and “Apple Daily”. Journal of Communication Research and Practice, 5(2), 53-78. https://doi.

　　org/10.6123/JCRP.2015.11]

謝卓君（2017）。從政策工具選擇省思臺灣高等教育治理。教育研究集刊，63（3）， 41-75。https://doi.org/10.3

　　966/102887082017096303002

[Hsieh, C.-C. (2017). Reflections on governance of Taiwan’s higher education based on an analysis of government’s

　　choice of policy instruments. Bulletin of Educational Research, 63(3), 41-75. https://doi.org/10.3966/1028870820170

　　96303002]

謝卓君（2021）。臺灣提升大學畢業生就業之政策設計分析。教育研究集刊，67（2）， 41-79。https://doi.org/

　　10.3966/102887082021066702002

[Hsieh, C.-C. (2021). Improving the employment of college graduates in Taiwan: An analysis of policy design. Bulletin

　　of Educational Research, 67(2), 41-79. https://doi.org/10.3966/1028 87082021066702002]

簡立欣、李侑珊（2020，5月2日）。新冠疫情，大學成重災戶。中時新聞網。取自https:// www.chinatimes.com/?

　　chdtv

[Jian, L.-X., & Li, Y.-S. (2020). The COVID-19 epidemic hits universities hardly. China Times News. Retrieved from

　　https://www.chinatimes.com/?chdtv]

顧瑜君（2007）。夥伴關係課程發展歷程中專家角色之研究。當代教育研究季刊，15 （2），141-186。

[Ku, Y.-C. (2007). The role of the curriculum expert in the process of partnership-based curriculum development.

　　Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 15(2), 141-186.]

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research

　　and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/ mum032

Ball, S. J. (2016). Neoliberal education? Confronting the slouching beast. Policy Futures in Education, 14(8), 1046-1059.

　　https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316664259

Burstein, P. (1991). Policy domains: Organization, culture, and policy outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology, 17(1), 327-

　　350.

Capano, G., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (Eds.). (2015). Varieties of governance: Dynamics, strategies, capacities. London,

　　UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration

　　Review, 67(6), 1059-1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 6210.2007.00797.x

de Weert, E. (2011). Perspectives on higher education and the labour market: Review of international policy developments.

　　Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/98cd/2 99bdae04af528e019713c64319d71a3ad1b.pdf

Donahue, J. (2004). On collaborative governance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

Flinders, M. (2002). Governance in Whitehall. Public Administration, 80(1), 51-75. https://doi. org/10.1111/467-

　　9299.00294

Frederickson, H. G. (1999). The repositioning of American public administration. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32(4),

　　701-711.

Greany, T. (2017). Collaboration, partnerships and system leadership across schools. In P. Earley & T. Greany (Eds.),

　　School leadership and education system reform (pp. 56-65). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic Press.

Gash, A. (2022). Collaborative governance. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp.

　　454-467). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Glasby, J., Dickinson, H., & Miller, R. (2011). Partnership working in England-where we are now and where we’ve come

　　from. International Journal of Integrated Care, 11(7). https:// doi.org/10.5334/ijic.545

Halligan, J. (2007). Reintegrating government in third generation reforms of Australia and New Zealand. Public Policy

　　and Administration, 22(2), 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767075899

Himmelman, A. T. (2002). Collaboration for a change: Definitions, decision-making models, roles, and collaboration

　　process guide. Minneapolis, MN: Himmelman Consulting.

Hsieh, C. C. (2018). Institutional change in the iron Cage: A case study in Taiwan. In J. C. Shin (Ed.), Higher education

　　governance in East Asia transformations under neoliberalism (pp. 161-177). Singapore: Springer.

Huxham, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management, 2(3), 337- 357. https://doi.org/10.10

　　80/1471903000000021

Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics in the membership of collaboration. Human

　　Relations, 53(6), 771-806. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0018726700536002

Ioannidou, A. (2007). A comparative analysis of new governance instruments in the transnational educational space: A

　　shift to knowledge-based instruments?. European Educational Research Journal, 6(4), 336-347. https://doi.org/10.230

　　4/eerj.2007.6.4.336

Kelman, S. (2007). The transformation of government in the decade ahead. In D. F. Kettl & S. Kelman (Eds.), Reflections

　　on 21st century government management (pp. 33-35). Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.

Kickert, W. J. M. (1997). Public governance in the Netherlands: An alternative to AngloAmerican “Managerialism”.

　　Public Administration, 75(4), 731-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1467-9299.00084

Klaster, E., Wilderom, C. P. M., & Muntslag, D. R. (2014). Education and employment: Stumbling across boundaries in

　　the Netherlands. In J. O’Flynn, D. Blackman, & J. Halligan (Eds.), Crossing boundaries in public management and

　　policy (pp. 229-244). London, UK: Routledge.

Ling, T. (2002). Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration,

　　80(4), 615-642. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00321

Management Advisory Committee. (2004). Connecting government: Whole of government responses to Australia’s

　　priority challenges. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.

McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation

　　and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 133-152. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/1163726

Meredith, J. (1993). Theory building through conceptual methods. International Journal of Operations & Production

　　Management, 13(5), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 01443579310028120

O’Flynn, J. (2014). Crossing boundaries: The fundamental questions in public management and policy. In J. O’Flynn, D.

　　Blackman, & J. Halligan (Eds.), Crossing boundaries in public management and policy (pp. 11-44). London, UK:

　　Routledge.

O’Flynn, J., Blackman, D., & Halligan, J. (Eds.). (2014). Crossing boundaries in public management and policy. London,

　　UK: Routledge.

O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (2009). The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century.

　　Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

O’Leary, R., & Vij, N. (2012). Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going? The

　　American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012445780

Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance. Public Management Review, 8(3), 337-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14

　　719030600853022

Petak, W. J. (1985). Emergency management: A challenge for public administration. Public Administration Review, 45(1),

　　3-7. https://doi.org/10.2307/3134992

Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. London, UK: Macmilan. Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G.

　　(2005). Governing complex societies: Trajectories and scenarios. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pilbeam, C., Alvarez, G., & Wilson, H. (2012). The governance of supply networks: A systematic literature review. Supply

　　Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(4), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/1359841211246512

Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined-up government: A survey. Political Studies Review, 1(1), 34-49. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1478-

　　9299.00004

Resh, W., Siddiki, S., & McConnell, W. R. (2014). Does the network centrality of government actors matter? Examining

　　the role of government organizations in aquaculture partnerships. Review of Policy Research, 31(6), 584-609. https:

　　//doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12101

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government1. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667. https:

　　//doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747x

Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). Governance and public administration. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 54-90). New

　　York, NY: Oxford.

Robinson, M. (2015). From old public administration to the new public service: Implications for public sector reform in

　　developing countries. Singapore: UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.

Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2016). Do crises lead to policy change? The multiple streams framework and the European

　　Union’s economic governance instruments. Policy Sciences, 49(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9239-4

Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in

　　operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)

　　00019-9

Williams, P. (2013). We are all boundary spanners now? The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1),

　　17-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293417

 

Full Text Download


EndNote
下載可匯入格式