Volume 71 No.2（Special Issue）（Open Access） - 2025-06-30

（Special Issue Paper）【Research Paper】The Context and Research Trends of the 108 Curriculum Guidelines Over the Past Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis

（專刊論文）【研究論文】近十年108課綱研究脈絡及發展趨勢：基於文獻計量學分析

Author：
Yu-Yuan Huang, Chien-Chih Chen / 黃裕元、陳建志
Keyword：
108 curriculum guidelines, 12-year basic education, bibliometrics, policy implementation, competency-based approach / 108課綱、十二年國民基本教育、文獻計量、政策實施、素養導向
  • Summary
  • Chinese Summary
  • Reference
  • Scholarly references
（1）Purpose: This study examines the impact of the 108 Curriculum Guidelines (108CG) over the past decade on Taiwan’s educational reforms, providing an in-depth analysis of the challenges encountered during its implementation. By conducting this comprehensive review, this study aims to offer recommendations for future policy improvements. The research objectives are as follows: (1) to investigate the distribution of academic research on the 108CG; (2) to identify research hotspots and analyze developmental trends in 108CG-related research to inform future educational policy-making.（2）Main Theories or Conceptual Frameworks: The 108CG, introduced by Taiwan’s Ministry of Education in 2014 and fully implemented in 2019, marked a shift from traditional ability-based education to a competency-oriented model focused on “spontaneity,” “interaction,” and “the common good.” This study employs bibliometric analysis to synthesize post-implementation research and trace the academic development and key thematic trends in this evolving field.（3）Research Design/Methods/Participants: This study conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including the Airiti Library, the National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan, Web of Science (WoS), ProQuest, and Scopus. Following the study objectives, two researchers independently applied the PRISMA protocol to screen literature, ensuring impartiality in the selection process by calculating inter-rater reliability for the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Ultimately, 1,628 relevant articles were included, spanning 157 journals, 364 keywords, and 1,552 authors. To examine the development trends in academic research since the implementation of the 108CG, this study employed bibliometric methods to analyze (1) annual publication volume, authorpublication count, and journal publication frequency; (2) keyword frequency analysis, burst detection, and co-occurrence analysis; and (3) thematic clustering and evolution analysis. Utilizing CiteSpace 6.3.R2 for bibliometric and data visualization techniques, the study identifies critical research areas and trends within the evolving landscape of 108CG-related research.（4）Research Findings or Conclusions: The research findings indicate that since 2019, studies related to the 108CG have shown steady annual growth, with a notable increase in publication volume between 2019 and 2022. During this period, numerous academic articles have focused on policy implementation, competency-oriented instructional practices, and teacher professional development within the context of the 108CG. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identified frequently appearing keywords in recent years, such as “core competencies,” “competency-based approach,” “self-directed learning,” and “learning outcomes,” highlighting the academic community’s extensive exploration of 21st-century competencies (108CG) practices. Furthermore, discussions on curriculum design reveal a strong focus on interdisciplinary learning and school-based curricula, indicating a shift in Taiwan’s educational reforms from single-discipline instruction to a multidisciplinary, cross-domain approach to nurturing a broader set of competencies.（5）Theoretical or Practical Insights/Contributions/Recommendations: While the 108CG has driven significant reforms in competency-based education, their implementation faces challenges, including increased teaching pressures, insufficient resource allocation for schools, and the need to enhance student motivation. This study recommends that future educational policies strengthen support systems for teachers and schools to facilitate effective curriculum adoption, emphasizing expanded teacher training and equitable distribution of resources. Additionally, continuous assessment of curriculum effectiveness is essential to inform policy refinements and promote improvements, ensuring sustainable development of educational reforms.
（1）研究目的：本研究透過回顧108課綱十年來的發展，深入探討其在臺灣教育改革中所產生的影響，並針對其施行過程中所面臨的挑戰進行全面分析，以提供未來政策改進的建議。研究目的包括：一、探討108課綱相關學術研究的分布情形；二、分析108課綱施行至今的研究脈絡與發展趨勢，為未來教育政策提供參考依據。（2）主要理論或概念架構：108課綱於2014年由教育部發布並於2019年全面實施，象徵臺灣教育由傳統能力本位教育轉向素養導向教育，強調「自發」、「互動」、「共好」等學習念，以培養具備21世紀核心素養的學生。本研究以文獻計量學（bibliometrics）為基礎，彙整學術界在108課綱實施後的研究成果，解析此領域的學術發展軌跡與重點主題。（3）研究設計／方法／對象：本研究從華藝線上圖書館（Airiti）、臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統、Web　of Science（WoS）、ProQuest及Scopus等資料庫進行文獻檢索。依據研究目的，兩位研究者分別遵循PRISMA程序進行文獻篩選，為避免篩選文獻產生偏頗，影響分析成果，兩位研究者納入、排除文獻再經統計計算編碼者間的一致性信度。研究最終納入1,628篇相關文獻，涵蓋157種期刊、364個關鍵字、1,552位作者，分析自108課綱施行以來的學術研究發展趨勢。本研究採文獻計量法進行以下分析：一、歷年文獻發表量、作者發表量、期刊發表量；二、關鍵字分析、關鍵字突現分析、關鍵字共現分析；三、主題聚類分析、主題演變分析等。使用CiteSpace 6.3.R2進行文獻計量分析，並結合資料可視化技術，深入識別重點研究領域和主題演變。（4）研究發現或結論：研究結果顯示，從2019年起，108課綱相關研究每年穩步增長，尤其在2019至2022年間增速明顯增加。在這段時間，許多學術論文集中探討108課綱的政策實施、素養導向的教學實踐，以及教師專業發展等議題。透過關鍵字共現分析，本研究發現「核心素養」、「素養導向」、「自主學習」、「學習成效」等關鍵字頻繁出現，顯示學術界對於108課綱的實踐有其廣泛探究。此外，研究者對於課程設計的探討也發現對跨領域學習、校訂課程等議題的高度關注，顯示臺灣教育改革正逐漸從單一學科轉向多元且跨領域的素養培育方向。（5）理論或實務創見／貢獻／建議：108課綱雖推動了素養教育的改革，帶來顯著的積極影響，但在實施層面仍面臨一些挑戰，例如教師的教學壓力、學校資源配置不足，以及如何提升學生的學習動機等。研究建議未來教育政策應更加注重教師與學校在推動新課綱時所需的支援體系，加強教師培訓，促進資源公平配置，並持續評估課綱的實施成效，進行政策的調整與優化，確保教育改革的可持續發展。
吳清山（2022）。十二年國民基本教育。元照。
[Wu, C.-S. (2022). The 12-year basic education program. Angle.]
吳清山（2024）。邁向十二年國民基本教育2.0的重要課題。教育研究月刊，362，43-
　　62。https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602024060362003
[Wu, C.-S. (2024). Towards the important issues of the 12-year basic education 2.0. Journal of
　　Education Research, 362, 43-62. https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602024060362003]
林永豐（2017）。核心素養的課程教學轉化與設計。教育研究月刊，275，4-17。https://
　　doi.org/10.3966/168063602017030275001
[Lin, Y.-F. (2017). Transformation and design of competence-based curriculum and
　　instruction. Journal of Education Research, 275, 4-17. https://doi.org/10.3966/
　　168063602017030275001]
林官蓓、陳建志（2023）。普通高中校長實施108課綱之課程與教學領導探究：兼
　　論校長公開授課成效。課程與教學，26（4），33-62。https://doi.org/10.6384/
　　CIQ.202310_26(4).0002
[Lin, K.-P., & Chen, C.-C. (2023). The practice of curriculum and instructional leadership in the
　　implementation of the 2019 curricula guidelines in a general senior high school: An effect
　　analysis on the open classes. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 26(4), 33-62. https://doi.
　　org/10.6384/CIQ.202310_26(4).0002]
林宜樺、吳俊憲（2024）。技術型高中素養導向教學融入實作課程之探究—以
　　實用技能學程為例。課程與教學，27（3），73-100。https://doi.org/10.6384/
　　CIQ.202407_27(3).0003
[Lin, Y.-H., & Wu, C.-H. (2024). Research on integrating of literacy-oriented teaching
　　into practical courses in technical high schools: Taking practical skills courses as an
　　example. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 27(3), 73-100. https://doi.org/10.6384/
　　CIQ.202407_27(3).0003]
國家教育研究院（1996）。教育改革總諮議報告書。
[National Academy for Educational Research. (1996). Final report of the National Advisory
　　Conference on educational reform.]
張靖敏、張道宜、劉雅萍、陳美瑩（2022）。因材網：教育部人工智慧知識結構分析診
　　斷及適性學習平台之析論。台灣教育研究期刊，3（1），313-331。
[Chang, C.-M., Chang, T.-Y., Liu, Y.-P., & Chen, M.-Y. (2022). Taiwan adaptive learning
　　platform: An introduction to platform applying artificial intelligence to knowledge structure
　　analysis and diagnosis for adaptive learning. Journal of Taiwan Education Studies, 3(1),
　　313-331.]
教育部（2011）。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。
[Ministry of Education. (2011). Ministry of Education’s implementation plan for the 12-year
　　basic education program.]
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要—總綱。
[Ministry of Education. (2014). The curriculum for the 12-year basic education: General
　　guidelines.]
教育部（2019）。數學領域課程綱要。
[Ministry of Education. (2019). Mathematics learning area– Curriculum guidelines.]
教育部國民及學前教育署（2019）。校訂課程發展手冊。
[K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education. (2019). School-based curriculum
　　development manual, K-12 education administration.]
許健將（2022）。混成學習（2003∼2021年）之文獻計量學分析。教育研究月刊，339，
　　87-106。https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602022070339006
[Sheu, J.-J. (2022). A bibliometric analysis on blended learning (2003-2021). Journal of
　　Education Research, 339, 87-106. https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602022070339006]
陳文彥（2021）。教師領導知識基礎的文獻計量分析。教育研究與發展期刊，17（2），
　　1-35。https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202106_17(2).0001
[Chen, W.-Y. (2021). A bibliometric review of the knowledge base of teacher leadership.
　　Journal of Educational Research and Development, 17(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.6925/
　　SCJ.202106_17(2).0001]
陳斐卿（2021）。普通高中如何轉譯108課綱：政策促動觀點。課程與教學，24（1），
　　149-173。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202101_24(1).0006
[Chen, F.-C. (2021). How senior high schools translate the 108 national curriculum guidelines:
　　Perspectives on a policy enactment. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 24(1), 149-173.
　　https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202101_24(1).0006]
陳景花（2021）。知識翻新研究趨勢之文獻計量分析。教育研究月刊，324，18-37。
　　https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602021040324002
[Chen, J.-H. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of research trends in knowledge building. Journal of
　　Education Research, 324, 18-37. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602021040324002]
曾正宜（2021）。新課綱核心概念再探。教育研究月刊，324，4-17。https://doi.org/10.
　　3966/168063602021040324001
[Tzeng, J.-Y. (2021). Reconsidering the core concepts of the new curriculum. Journal of
　　Education Research, 324, 4-17. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602021040324001]
湯家偉、王俐淳（2021）。《教師專業素養指引與師資職前教育課程基準》實施之影
　　響、挑戰與因應：中等師資培育機構之觀點。當代教育研究季刊，29（2），61-
　　94。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202106_29(2).0003
[Tang, C.-W., & Wang, L.-C. (2021). The influence, challenges, and coping strategies of
　　the “Standard for Pre-service Teacher Education Curriculum” from the perspective of
　　secondary school teacher education institutions. Contemporary Educational Research
　　Quarterly, 29(2), 61-94. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202106_29(2).0003]
楊怡婷（2019）。十二年國教校訂課程實施之挑戰與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊，8
　　（1），201-204。
[Yang, Y.-T. (2019). Challenges and coping strategies in implementing school-based curriculum
　　in the 12-year basic education reform. Taiwan Educational Review, 8(1), 201-204.]
楊俊鴻（2022）。108課綱中[領域]與[跨領域]之意涵探究。臺灣教育評論月刊，11
[Yang, J.-H. (2022). Exploring the meanings of “disciplinary” and “interdisciplinary” in the
　　　context of the 2019 curriculum guidelines. Taiwan Educational Review, 11(10), 14-17.]
潘慧玲、洪瑞璇（2022）。共治共學觀關乎課程變革？教師對十二年國教課綱變革
　　意向的影響因素。當代教育研究季刊，30（1），1-37。https://doi.org/10.6151/
　　CERQ.202203_30(1).0001
[Pan, H.-L., & Hung, J.-H. (2022). Do conceptions of shared decision-making and collective
　　learning matter in curriculum change? Exploring the influential factors of teachers’ change
　　intention of the 12-year basic education curriculum guidelines. Contemporary Educational
　　Research Quarterly, 30(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202203_30(1).0001]
潘慧玲、陳文彥（2021） 。臺灣學校領導研究與全球學術的連結： 文獻計量
　　分析。教育科學研究期刊，66（ 2），175-206。https://doi.org/10.6209/
　　JORIES.202106_66(2).0006
[Pan, H.-L., & Chen, W.-Y. (2021). Connection between Taiwanese research on school
　　leadership and global scholarship: A bibliometric review. Journal of Research in Education
　　Sciences, 66(2), 175-206. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202106_66(2).0006]
潘慧玲、黃曬莉、陳文彥、鄭淑惠（2020）。學校準備好了嗎？國高中教育人員實施
　　108課綱的變革準備度。教育研究與發展期刊，16（1），65-100。https://doi.org/
　　10.6925/SCJ.202003_16(1).0003
[Pan, H.-L., Huang, L.-L., Chen, W.-Y., & Cheng, S.-H. (2020). Are schools ready? School
　　practitioners’ change readiness for the curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education.
　　Journal of Educational Research and Development, 16(1), 65-100. https://doi.org/10.6925/
　　SCJ.202003_16(1).0003]
潘慧玲、鄭淑惠（2021）。教室王國的解封：公開授課及其相關因素分析。課程與教
　　學，24（3），177-208。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202107_24(3).0007
[Pan, H.-L., & Cheng, S.-H. (2021). To lift the lockdown of classroom kingdoms: Open classes
　　and its influential factors. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 24(3), 177-208. https://doi.
　　org/10.6384/CIQ.202107_24(3).0007]
Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain
　　visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl_1), 5303-5310.
　　https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100
Coudenys, B., Strohbach, G., Tang, T., & Udabe, R. (2022). On the path toward lifelong
　　learning: an early analysis of Taiwan’s 12-year basic education reform. In F. M. Reimers,
　　U. Amaechi, A. Banerji, & M. Wang (Eds.), Education to build back better (pp. 75-98).
　　Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93951-9_4
Guo, L., Wang, D., Gu, F., Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhou, R. (2021). Evolution and trends in
　　intelligent tutoring systems research: A multidisciplinary and scientometric view. Asia
　　Pacific Education Review, 22(3), 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09697-7
Hicks, D., & Melkers, J. (2013). Bibliometrics as a tool for research evaluation. In A. N. Link
　　& N. S. Vonortas (Eds.), Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (pp.
　　323-349). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932402.00019
Ishak, E. H., & Rahman, A. (2019). Examination of changes in flood data in Australia. Water,
　　11(8), 1734. https://doi.org/10.3390/W11081734
Kleinberg, J. (2003). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge
　　Discovery, 7, 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1145/775047.775061
Lin, K. P., & Chen, C. C. (2024). Curriculum leadership in a rural indigenous high school
　　in Taiwan Implementing the 108 curriculum guidelines. British Educational Research
　　Journal, 50(5), 2260-2278. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4023
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-
　　282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Moher, D., Liberati, A., & Altman, D. G. (2009). PRISMA: Preferred reporting items for
　　systematic reviews and meta-analyses. PLoS Med, 6(7). https://docs.edtechhub.org/lib/
　　W8ACXNRM
Nguyen, U.-P., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Assessing the distinctive contributions of simulation &
　　gaming to the literature, 1970-2019: A bibliometric review. Simulation & Gaming, 51(6),
　　744-769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878120941569
Peng, R., Zhu, C., & Wu, W. (2021). Visualizing the emerging trends of acculturation research:
　　A bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2020. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(8-9),
　　794-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221211044782
Pojanapunya, P. (2016). Clustering keywords to identify concepts in texts: An analysis of
　　research articles in applied linguistics. Reflections, 22, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.
　　v22i0.112328
Qian, L., Zeng, X., Ding, Y., & Peng, L. (2023). Mapping the knowledge of ecosystem servicebased
　　ecological risk assessment: Scientometric analysis in CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and
　　SciMAT. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1326425. https://doi.org/10.3389/
　　fenvs.2023.1326425
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of
　　cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65. https://
　　doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
Silva, J. H. de O., Mendes, G. H. de S., Miguel, P. A. C., Amorim, M., & Teixeira, J. (2021).
　　Customer experience research: Intellectual structure and future research opportunities.
　　Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 31(6), 893-931. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-08-
　　2020-0193
Strotmann, A., & Zhao, D. (2012). Author name disambiguation: What difference does it make
　　in author based citation analysis? Journal of the American Society for Information Science
　　and Technology, 63(9), 1820-1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22695
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., & Zarin, W. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMAScR):
　　Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.
　　org/10.7326/m18-0850
Yao, Q., An, N., Yang, E., & Song, Z. (2023). Study on the progress in climate-change-oriented
　　human settlement research. Sustainability, 15(7), 5733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075733
You, K. (2019). Teachers’ practices and beliefs about grammar teaching. In P. Clements, A.
　　Krause, & H. Brown (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion (pp. 214-221). JALT. https://doi.
　　org/10.37546/JALTPCP2018-29
Zhang, D., Liu, B. W., Liang, X. Q., & Liu, F. Q. (2023). Immunological factors in cirrhosis
　　diseases from a bibliometric point of view. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 29(24),
　　3899-3910. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i24.3899

 

 

Full Text Download


EndNote
下載可匯入格式